TERMS & CONDITIONS   CARS   TRUCKS   BIKES   CARAVANS   BOATS   MACHINES   BS LINK   MOTORSM.COM
COMPLAINTS CORNER
complaints.motorsm.com
"Complaints Corner" provides an online billboard to publicize problems or complaints about your car or poor after-sales support from dealerships and manufacturers. Good news about exceptional customer service etc. will also be published. N.B. MotorSM is not responsible nor endorse views expressed by contributors.
LATEST POSTING
LOG IN - ADD COMMENTS
MARCH 2008 - COMPLAINTS CORNER     2/08 1/2008 12/07 11/07 10/07 9/07 8/07 7/07 6/06 5/07 4/07 3/07 2/07 1/07    2006

MITSUBISHI MAGNA V6 2000:  RE: STARTING INTERMITTENT     *REPLY*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
ENGINE

Hi All.

There is a known issue with this occurring in the TJ and some TL models and I suspect that this may also affect other (earlier models) of the 3rd Gen Magna's

One main cause is a low battery voltage, but the other common cause is a loose fitting connector that links the Body control module to the ECU. Effectively this makes the car "think" that it has received an incorrect security code from the Key Fob and shuts off the ignition and fuel systems.

The common symptom is the intermittent stalling of your car a second or so after starting. If you turn to reengage the starter it will turn over but not fire, but if you turn the key all they way back or remove it and try again, it will again start to fire (and then either stay running or stall again).

There is a pretty simple fix if this is your fault. I have included a link with instruction below - it’s not mine, but I can assure you it worked for both my parents TJ (2002) and my TL (2004).

martybugs.net/articles/magna-stall.cgi

Some people have resorted to soldering the connector in place, but in my experience just pulling the connectors out, brushing them off and re-inserting them gets it going again.

No guarantees it will fix your specific problem, but it seems to be a common fault with this model.

Hope it assists.

POSTED BY: BOLTON  - BRISBANE, QLD, AUS, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"MITSUBISHI MAGNA V6 2000: STARTING INTERMITTENT - For 3 months, have had intermittent start problem. Had it to the experts, however, faults do not show on computer diagnosis. Hard to fix? Engine fires, but then dies. After any where from one to 15 start attempts, it will fire. Once started, no problems.

Has anyone come across this fault? Please help, I am at the end of my tether. Good car otherwise."
POSTED BY: P MENYWEATHER - GLASSHOUSE MOUNTAINS, QLD - AUS 18 FEB 2007

========== REPLY ==========
I too have a V6 2000 Magna that's just started to do this. Only does it when cold and once started runs fine. When investigating the problem I noticed that my cruise control cable fitting is broken at the bracket and hanging loose. Apparently the cc and throttle cables need to be balanced so I'm wondering if this is affecting the automatic choke settings at startup?"
POSTED BY: DAVID NOBLE - KAREELA, NSW 10/04/2007

========== REPLY ==========
Try the connection to the distributor. The terminals corrode. You may need a new connector.
POSTED BY: M KURAN - MELBOURNE, VIC 11/4/2007

========== REPLY ==========
It isn't any ov that it is your battery is the problem. Our next door neighbours have a TJ Magna and it did the same thing. He replaced the battery and since then never missed a beat. I hope this helps.
POSTED BY: CHRIS ANDERSON - MARYBOROUGH, QLD 14/4/2007

========== REPLY ==========
Onya Chris. My sister has had 2 Magnas/Veradas and have both done the same when the battery was low/failing. A good idea to check all power and ground points from the battery, especially the ground cable from body to motor. Another symptom is remotes failing due to low voltage for the receiver.
POSTED BY: L DAVIS - BOMADERRY, NSW 16/4/2007

========== REPLY ==========
I own a TJ had the same problem. Your battery is stuffed. When you change the battery put an independent power supply thru your cigarette lighter 9 volt from auto shops so you don't have to reset your ecu and radio.
POSTED BY: RAY SEAL - ADELAIDE, SA 18/04/2007

========== REPLY ==========
Had same problem with 02 Verada, cleaned out iac valve on throttle body with carby cleaner. Never had problem since.
POSTED BY: TREVOR MORRIS - CARRUM DOWNS, VIC 9/1/2008

KIA CARNIVAL LS 2001:  SHOULD WE RENAME IT THE COILING SYSTEM INSTEAD OF THE COOLING SYSTEM?    *COMPLAINT*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
ENGINE

Yep! It’s another KIA Carnival with oil in the cooling system. Bought secondhand 13 months ago with 71000 on the clock. We’ve added 13,000 in the time we have had it and KIA have told me something about projected/expected kms per year. I think they were seriously questioning the legitimacy of the kms on the clock. My dealer is trying to help but doesn’t like my chances. Says that because the car is over five years old KIA are likely to turn me away.

We paid 15k for this car and the dealer says it could cost up to 7k to fix. If I had 7k sitting around doing nothing I would have put it with the original 15k and bought a secondhand Voyager. Waiting for Kia to turn down my 'goodwill' request to be able to start the ball rolling and fight the fight of my life. Other States have been successful in getting reimbursed, Victoria needs to take a stand and make KIA listen to us too.

www.drive.com.au/Editorial/ArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=9140&IsPgd=0

Copy and paste this link and read what a KIA spokesman has said about the fault and the subsequent repairs.

POSTED BY: MELINDA MILLER - BENDIGO, VIC, AUS, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK

LANDROVER DISCOVERY II 2001:  RE: THE 3 AMIGOS: ABS, TC AND HDC LIGHTS - ANOTHER ABS MODULATOR FAILURE    *REPLY*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
BRAKES

What is the status on a factory recall?

My brakes are pretty important. I am up for any legal action that is required to get the matter resolved.

POSTED BY: MATTHEW LAMM - AUSTIN, TX, USA, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"LANDROVER DISCOVERY II 2001: THE 3 AMIGOS: ABS, TC AND HDC LIGHTS - ANOTHER ABS MODULATOR FAILURE - I own a 2001 LR discovery II with the same issue and don't know what to do about it. My wife and my three children ride in the SUV. I'm afraid that until someone get hurt or even killed, Land Rover will not take responsibility for it. You have my full support in our effort to seek help with this matter.

Regards,

James Croffie"
POSTED BY: JAMES CROFFIE - COLUMBIA SC, USA 1 FEB 2008

TOYOTA RAV4  2001:  RE: TRANSMISSION FAILS ON 6 YEAR OLD CAR     *REPLY*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
TRANSMISSION

Please contact me re 2002 Rav4 4 transmission problems. I am part of 23 people who have gotten replies from that are gathering information for a class action suit on this problem.

POSTED BY: JOANNE MOORE - FRANKLIN, USA, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
"I have a 2001 Rav4. I took my car to the dealer for the required maintenance as I always do. I asked them to check my transmission because my car was slipping into 2nd gear. I was told that I now need an ECU because the computer is not telling the car to change gears the way it is supposed to. I see that this is a common problem, I was quoted $1500.00 for the replacement. It sounds like I need to get rid of my car."
POSTED BY: ADRIAN - GA , USA 20 FEB 2008

========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"TOYOTA RAV4 2001: TRANSMISSION FAILS ON 6 YEAR OLD CAR - After 6 years, and 90,000 kilometres of having my 2001 RAV4 regularly serviced by the dealer at considerable expense, the ECU (transmission computer) has faulted and caused "transmission burning clutches and contaminating internals". The repair has been quoted at $7000.00.

I would like to know if this is a problem others have encountered and to warn others considering a RAV4 of this possible issue. The car has only been driven on the road under normal conditions."
POSTED BY: CORRINE MARSHALL - MELBOURNE, VIC, AUS 27/09/2007

========== REPLY ==========
Just went through exactly the same problem. Our repair bill was just under $8000. I have a five door 2002 RAV4 automatic cruiser.

First the car was slipping in gears. It was not a gradual thing eihter ... it just suddenly failed. Upon inspection the clutches were burnt out. The gear box was repaired and it flamed another box. I had the computer checked by Toyota and an independent specialist and no fault codes etc. indicated a problem. In the end a new computer was put in, problem solved!

Basically the ECU malfunctioned causing the gear box clutches to burn out. The ECU didn't even indicate any fault codes or go into the safe mode like they are suppose to. Gear box had to come out twice and so did the engine. I got a 24 month warranty on repairs ... make sure you do as well. Will be selling **** before that though! I was lucky that the workshop I go through is owned by a friend and was not charged for the engine coming out 2 and a half times
POSTED BY: SCOTT - BRISBANE, QLD, AUS 24/12/2007

========== REPLY ==========
I would like to get more information about the class action suit. I am starting the debacle that I see is going to get very costly...
POSTED BY: BEVERLY TOOKEY - CARY, NC USA 15 APR 2008

========== REPLY ==========
I bought my 2002 RAV4 in November of 2006. The check engine light stayed on constantly. I was told it was an O2 sensor and that it would take $300 to fix but that it did not affect the car's performance. In February I received a notice that I should take the vehicle to the dealer to have a recall taken care of, which I did.

The check engine light went off but I started having transmission problems. I took it to the dealer and they charged me $150 to check it out. They said I needed a new computer ($1,300). I then took it to a transmission specialist to check out ($85.00). He said it was not my transmission but the computer (EMC).

I started researching and found out about this problem being not just mine. Being a single mother with two children and on a very tight budget, this is my only transportation, which I do not consider safe until this gets fixed. I was having this shifting problem in a very busy intersection and was very upset with the fact that Toyota would not stand behind their product and fix the EMC at no cost to the consumer.
POSTED BY: KRYSTIE DUNN - MOBILE, AL USA 26 JUN 2008

TOYOTA RAV4  2002:  HARD 2/3 SHIFT    *FEEDBACK WANTED*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
TRANSMISSION

Looking for others that have experienced problem with hard shifting from 2 to 3rd with 2002 Rav4.

POSTED BY: JOANNE MOORE - FRANKLIN, USA, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
Had the same problem with my 2002 Rav4. Transmission rebuilt still have the same problem. I was told by Toyota no new update to flash computer. They suspects the problem is in the transmission. Rebuilt not done by Toyota.
POSTED BY: HOPETON - ALBANY, NY USA 16/4/2008

FORD FALCON AU III 2003:  RE: FUEL INJECTOR SYSTEM WITH GAS     *REPLY*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
GAS

If you can afford the injected system best to go for that. You do not need it but it definitely stops backfiring. I got an 05 Ford wagon done for $4200 over here so far so good, it’s been 7 months? Up to you though good luck.

POSTED BY: MARC  - MELBOURNE, VIC, AUS, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"FORD FALCON AUIII 2003: FUEL INJECTOR SYSTEM WITH GAS - I have Ford Falcon AU Series III 4 ltr. I want to covert to Gas.

Some installer says that Fuel injector system is also required which will cost $1500 more. If you do not install Fuel injector system you may face back fire and also not safe. Some installer says Fuel injector system is not required and you will not face any problems. This is required only for model 2004 onward. I am not sure which statement is correct and which system I should install. Can anyone guide me? Thanks"
POSTED BY: BK GUPTA - PERTH, WA, AUS 29 MAR 2008

TOYOTA RAV4  2002:  RE: TRANSMISSION FAILURE AFTER 106K     *REPLY*

31/03/2008

ISSUE:
TRANSMISSION

I wanted you to know there is a group of 23 people who are in the process of class action suit for this Toyota problem. Please contact me for further information.

POSTED BY: JOANNE MOORE - FRANKLIN, USA, 31/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"TOYOTA RAV4 2002: TRANSMISSION FAILURE AFTER 106K - I just went through rebuilding my transmission for $3,760 and the problem of hard shifting/jerking in 1, 2 and 3rd gear did Not go away. This is a major issue with these cars. I am looking into suing Toyota. These cars need to be recalled in a Major way. Please contact me if you're interested in fighting the fight with me. "
POSTED BY: MELODY BERRY - SEATTLE, USA 16 FEB 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Hi, I have a 2001 Rav4. I have been into 2 Toyota dealerships and expressed my fear of ECU/ECM failure and subsequent transmission failure. They said if a Rav owner gets hard shift problems, don’t replace the transmission, replace the ECM/ECU. I have 77,000 KM on my Rav.
POSTED BY: CHRIS - VANCOUVER BC, CANADA 8 MARCH 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Yes I had my 2002 Rav4 for 5 months when this happened and paid around $5,000 for repairs. They put in 3 different transmissions with no luck and then a solenoid part. Now 1 year later the solenoid B electrical is failing.

The Dealership tried to sell me a new car rather than deal with it. They kept telling me it was safe to drive when it wasn't. Finally the repair specialist I took it to, had to consult with engineers from Detroit? To get the answer - try the solenoid part. That finally work, now its happening again. The engine light is on and the acceleration is slow. It’s not jerky yet I am taking it in as this should be covered under warranty.
POSTED BY: KAROL - PORTLAND, OREGON USA 22 APRIL 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Going through the same issues. I'm in on the lawsuit.
POSTED BY: BRIAN - LOUISVILLE, KY USA 23 APRIL 2008

MAZDA 2 MAXX 0:  RE: MAZDA 2 MAXX DRIVER SEAT PROBLEM     *REPLY*

30/03/2008

ISSUE:
SEATS

Hi I'm a vehicle inspector from Sydney. You have already notified Mazda that’s good. I can tell you go and visit a motor trimmer ASAP get them to check it and write you a report.

POSTED BY: ALEX  - SYDNEY, NSW, AUS, 30/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"I wonder if anyone has had a problem with a Mazda 2 Maxx driver's seat?

About 6-12 months ago I felt something "give" in the driver's seat i.e. in the part one sits on (I weigh 55kg). One day when I got into the car, I felt something like a band had buckled or bent underneath me. It happened to a lesser degree a couple of times after that. I feel as though something is not quite right with the seat when I am driving but of course I could be imagining it.

A Mazda service man had a look and pressed the seat down with his hands, also sat in the seat. Said he could not find anything wrong but would make a note of it on their computer. I went back to Mazda last week and saw a senior person in service and he also said he could not feel anything wrong, plus he raised and lowered the seat and moved it forward and back.

As the 3 year warranty runs out in a few days, I want to be sure in case a problem develops. Any feedback on the seat problem would be very much appreciated. Thanks."
POSTED BY: MARGARET GRAVES - SYDNEY, NSW - AUS 31 JUL 2007 PROVIDE FEEDBACK

========== REPLY ==========
Hi, just letting you know that if you’re worried about your seat take it to a marine / auto re-upholsterer. Ask them for advice only because they’re not a dealership. They will be honest with you.
POSTED BY: TONY NICKLASON - LOGAN CENTRAL, QLD 1/8/2007

HONDA CR-V  2003:  HONDA CRV AIR CON    *COMPLAINT*

30/03/2008

ISSUE:
AIR CONDITIONER

Further to a recent posting I read concerning Honda CRV air con failure. I bought a 2003 Honda CRV about 18 months ago. Within two months the compressor failed. I was telling a mate who also has the same make and model CRV and he said his failed about a week prior to mine. Both units were only a few months out of warranty. I paid just under $2000 to get a new part fitted and the system flushed and cleaned. It lasted two days. The second unit was replaced under warranty and has lasted 1 and a half months and no longer blows cold air so it also is going back. I have never had such failure in an air conditioning unit.

I am lucky I have a good mechanic who goes in to bat for me when this stuff happens, but sometimes it is like bashing your head against a brick wall with Honda. I also have problems with the clutch operation, but Honda told me it is just the way I drive - funny how everyone else who drives it also has the same problem as me - even when I haven't told them about the trouble with the clutch take up!

POSTED BY: GRAHAM BURRIDGE - CAIRNS, QLD, AUS, 30/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK

PRESS-RELEASE AAA  2008:  WORKING FAMILIES PAY LESS FOR PETROL ON “CHEAP TUESDAY”    *PRESS RELEASE*

30/03/2008

ISSUE:
FUEL PRICE

AAA Executive Director, Mike Harris, said a saving of one cent per litre could mean motorists as a whole would save $200 million a year. And savings of more than this can be achieved by buying at the bottom of the regular weekly price cycle.

“We have been looking at the price cycles in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide and can see that the average retail price is typically lower on Tuesday in each of these mainland capital cities, compared to any other day of the week,” Mr Harris said.

“The price cycle in these capital cities is a weekly one and the analysis shows that the average difference between the peak and the trough was 8.9cpl in 2007.”

Mr Harris said the ‘predictive nature’ of the weekly cycle means motorists can pay less for petrol simply by buying on “Cheap Tuesday”. He also noted that the length of the cycle and the difference between the peak and the trough was an indicator of the high degree of competition in the petrol market.

“There is no doubt that the predictable weekly cycle gives the price conscious motorist the opportunity to take advantage of low prices on Tuesdays,” he said.

Additional ANOP market research shows that 88% of motorists are aware that petrol is cheaper on certain days, with 71% of these nominating Tuesday as the cheapest day.

“Motorists are not mugs” said Mr Harris, adding that “the majority of motorists are voting with their feet and actually buying on Tuesdays.”

Information contained in the ACCC Report on ‘Petrol Prices and Australian Consumers’ (December 2007) confirms that motorists do in fact buy on “Cheap Tuesday”, with sales volumes in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide all being significantly higher on Tuesday compared to any other day of the week.

“Lower prices on Tuesdays, coupled with high volumes is a simple equation that translates to working families being able to save money each year by taking advantage of the existing, predictable price cycles,” said Mr Harris.

“Further analysis reveals that 76% of motorists buy fuel at least once a week. A weekly cycle gives these motorists the opportunity to always buy at the low point of the cycle.

The savings presented by this opportunity can translate into millions of dollars for motorists as a whole. In 2007, motorists purchased almost 20,000 million litres of petrol. A saving of just one cent per litre – and greater amounts than this can be saved by buying at the bottom of the cycle - therefore translates into savings of $200 million over a year.

POSTED BY: AAA AUSTRALIAN AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION - CANBERRA, ACT - AUS, 30/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK

TOYOTA LANDCRUISER 100 SER GXV V8 1998:  RE: ON PETROL/GAS. 2 ENGINE FAILURES IN LESS THAN 7 MTHS    *FEEDBACK WANTED*

30/03/2008

ISSUE:
ENGINE

Thanks Mark. I've only come up with an address for a Toyota Landcruiser 4WD Club in WA & will write to them this week. We wanted to know why then did the newer 2004 replacement engine we installed last year do the same thing? We also spent nearly $4000 late 2006 on a whole new brake system, which was caused by an electronic failure (a solenoid). It was explained to us that when one thing fails it sets up a chain of events which leads to the brake system failing, this required a new one.

Regards, Danielle

POSTED BY: DANIELLE MCFADDEN - DUNSBOROUGH, WA, AUS, 30/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"TOYOTA LANDCRUISER 100 SER GXV V8 1998: LANDCRUISER 1998 V8 ON PETROL/GAS. 2 ENGINE FAILURES IN LESS THAN 7 MTHS - We purchased 1998 Toyota Landcruiser GXV V8 in 2005 from Melville Toyota. Within the 3 month warranty period we noticed a problem with the gearbox, which Melville Toyota fixed by rebuilding some of the gears. Later that year we converted it to Gas at The Gas Converters in Canning Vale at an approx cost of $3000 (incl spare wheel carrier from another company).

We rang approx 6 gas converters - got various feedback to say - some had never done it; some wouldn't as had heard of motors blowing up; the company we chose said they work well. We mentioned a V8 that we'd heard of blowing up, but the guy said the installers had used the wrong gas components in the installation. He was happy to do it. We were living in remote country & would get it serviced when in Perth as regularly as possible. Some back firing which the Gas people said was normal.

May 2007 towing a camper van from Perth to Coral Bay & on return trip heading into Geraldton doing 30 kms an hour - Bang. Blown a hole in the engine. The number 8 cylinder seized inside the bore, the con rod broke and got thrown outside the engine block. Found a 2004 engine in NT for $8800 & paid Melville Toyota nearly $4000 to install.

Tuesday this week March 2008, driving 70 kms an hour approx 4 kms from home, put my foot down to overtake and Bang! We've received the wonderful news that it has done it again! To say we are devastated is an understatement. Why? Why are gas converters converting cars that shouldn't be on gas. Why is the government encouraging us / the gas converters with their payment when some cars should Not Be On Gas. Why did Melville Toyota not advise us to remove the gas last year when installing the engine? We bought a Toyota Landcruiser for their room, their reliability, their name.

We do not have the money to replace the engine Again at the moment - we haven't even fully paid off the last one. I've rung DOCEP (Department of Consumer & Employment Protection) who've just said straight up get an Independent Vehicle Inspection Report before they can even look into it. If you're thinking of converting your Landcruiser to gas, Think Again! Has anyone else heard of /or had a similar problem?"
POSTED BY: DANIELLE MCFADDEN - DUNSBOROUGH, WA, AUS 28 MAR 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Danielle,
The early V8 Toyota engines had many failures exactly like yours. Usually a piston ceases in the bore. Many engines have piston slap and are noticeably noisy when cold. These engines were fitted to Lexus vehicles too and suffered the same way. I would doubt that the gas conversion has caused your problem. Maybe the Landcruiser 4WD Club in your state can shed some light on this.

Good Luck, Mark.
POSTED BY: MARK KURAN - MELBOURNE, VIC 29/3/2008

NISSAN NAVARA D40 2006:  RE: D40 CLUTCH     *REPLY*

30/03/2008

ISSUE:
CLUTCH

Mark,
Due to an observed number of failures I did some research on the D40 clutch some time back and came to the conclusion the clutch is too small, this is contributing to the failures Nissan is having.

The diameter is 240mm and compared to the Rodeo at 275mm is much smaller considering the Rodeo also produces less torque. The dual mass flywheel doesn't seem to be standing up too well either although Nissan is not the only company having trouble with DMF.

What is your fuel consumption like?

Regards, Alwyn

POSTED BY: AL  - CAIRNS, QLD, AUS, 30/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
Hi tom, I have a D40 it now has around 50,000kms on the clock, but I had my clutch replaced before it reached 30,000kms and are sure that this second clutch is on its way out. I reckon it can’t handle the 1.5 tone I tow on a daily basis. First clutch replaced under warranty I think it will be a different story second time round.

Mark
POSTED BY: MARK - CANBERRA, ACT, AUS 29 MAR 2008

========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"NISSAN NAVARA D40 STX 2006: D40 CLUTCH - My D40 clutch felt weak from new. Mentioned to dealer that it didn't take load well. A month later it blew while driving on bitumen. Had hardly any off road use, only 18k on the clock. Nissan replaced clutch, provided hire car and towed vehicle 300km home all under warranty, although hesitant at first.

New clutch is totally different, given it heaps and feels fine."
POSTED BY: TOM HAMILTON - BRISBANE, QLD, AUS 11 FEB 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Hi Tom,
Can you let me know which dealer in Brisbane did this for please? I have a slight fluttering in the clutch as it disengages in 1st and 2nd. I have had them test drive it and they want to pull the gearbox out and check the fly wheel. I am cautious that they may tell me it is not under warranty but I know it should be as the car is 8 months old and only done 21000Kms! I bought mine in Brisbane I am interested to see which dealer looked after you so well.
POSTED BY: GREG - BRISBANE, QLD 6/3/2008

HOLDEN ASTRA  1999:  RE: NOTHING BUT A LEMON     *REPLY*

29/03/2008

ISSUE:
AIRBAGS

Don’t pay that much to get airbag light fixed!

My airbag light used to always stay on because I kept putting my shoes under the seat. Go to your local auto electrician and ask him what he can do. Every time mine comes on from keep forgetting not to put my shoes under my seat, he just takes out the panel in the centre console and just reconfigures the settings, takes like 5 minutes.

Try that first!

POSTED BY: ASHLEY G - TOWNSVILLE, QLD - AUS, 29/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
"I also have an Astra 1999 model, my air bag light is on also. I have been quoted $874 by a mechanic to fix it. I’m not sure what to do, as this seems a lot just to fix this maybe minor problem.

Do you know anybody else could help with my problem?

Thanks have a nice day."
POSTED BY: CHRISTINA MADDEN - EAST KEILOR, VIC, AUS 14 MAR 2008

========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"HOLDEN ASTRA CITY 2000: NOTHING BUT A LEMON - I purchased a brand new Astra City in 2000, everything was fine except the airbag light kept on lighting up. I took it back to Holden and they did something to the computer system and tripped it in so they said. The vehicle was still under warranty at this stage.

After the warranty ran out the light came on again, so I took it back to Holden and they informed me that there is a problem with the tension in the seat belts and the airbags are faulty and it would cost over $500 to fix. I said no way as I have never had an accident they should not be faulty. After complaining to head office they agreed to fix the problem only at a cost of $50 to me, so I agreed.

Then awhile later the timing belt went and as I see I shouldn't of just accepted it as the car had only done 80,000kms, but I paid $1000 to have this fixed. Now the engine light has appeared and I have just had to pay another $1000 to have a new computer system installed. At this time I suggested it may be fuel injector valves as advised by another mechanic - definitely not Holden advised.

Now my car is still having the same problem, I phoned the dealership up and they now say it has something to do with two valves not the fuel injectors valves. They now want over $500. I have phoned their head office as I have a file there. I am still waiting to hear from them.

I feel that this year of vehicle has had a fault with it from the start. They don't want to recall or admit to any fault. I will never buy a Holden or suggest to anyone that they are a worthy car."
POSTED BY: F CARMICHAEL - SUNBURY, VIC - AUS 3 FEB 2007

FORD FALCON AUIII 2003:  FUEL INJECTOR SYSTEM WITH GAS    *FEEDBACK WANTED*

29/03/2008

ISSUE:
GAS

I have Ford Falcon AU Series III 4 ltr. I want to covert to Gas.

Some installer says that Fuel injector system is also required which will cost $1500 more. If you do not install Fuel injector system you may face back fire and also not safe. Some installer says Fuel injector system is not required and you will not face any problems. This is required only for model 2004 onward. I am not sure which statement is correct and which system I should install. Can anyone guide me? Thanks

POSTED BY: BK GUPTA - PERTH, WA, AUS, 29/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
If you can afford the injected system best to go for that. You do not need it but it definitely stops backfiring. I got an 05 Ford wagon done for $4200 over here so far so good, it’s been 7 months? Up to you though good luck.
POSTED BY: MARC - MELBOURNE, VIC 31/3/2008

NISSAN NAVARA D40 STX 2006:  RE: D40 CLUTCH     *REPLY*

29/03/2008

ISSUE:
CLUTCH

Hi tom, I have a D40 it now has around 50,000kms on the clock, but I had my clutch replaced before it reached 30,000kms and are sure that this second clutch is on its way out. I reckon it can’t handle the 1.5 tone I tow on a daily basis. First clutch replaced under warranty I think it will be a different story second time round.

Mark

POSTED BY: MARK  - CANBERRA, ACT, AUS, 29/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"NISSAN NAVARA D40 STX 2006: D40 CLUTCH - My D40 clutch felt weak from new. Mentioned to dealer that it didn't take load well. A month later it blew while driving on bitumen. Had hardly any off road use, only 18k on the clock. Nissan replaced clutch, provided hire car and towed vehicle 300km home all under warranty, although hesitant at first.

New clutch is totally different, given it heaps and feels fine."
POSTED BY: TOM HAMILTON - BRISBANE, QLD, AUS 11 FEB 2008 PROVIDE FEEDBACK

========== REPLY ==========
Hi Tom,
Can you let me know which dealer in Brisbane did this for please? I have a slight fluttering in the clutch as it disengages in 1st and 2nd. I have had them test drive it and they want to pull the gearbox out and check the fly wheel. I am cautious that they may tell me it is not under warranty but I know it should be as the car is 8 months old and only done 21000Kms! I bought mine in Brisbane I am interested to see which dealer looked after you so well.
POSTED BY: GREG - BRISBANE, QLD 6/3/2008

========== REPLY ==========
Mark,
Due to an observed number of failures I did some research on the D40 clutch some time back and came to the conclusion the clutch is too small, this is contributing to the failures Nissan is having.

The diameter is 240mm and compared to the Rodeo at 275mm is much smaller considering the Rodeo also produces less torque. The dual mass flywheel doesn't seem to be standing up too well either although Nissan is not the only company having trouble with DMF.

What is your fuel consumption like?
Regards, Alwyn
POSTED BY: ALWYN - CAIRNS, QLD 30/3/2008

CAR-BUYING-SELLING ADVICE  0:  NATIONAL CAR CONNECTIONS     *COMPLAINT*

28/03/2008

ISSUE:
DELAER - USED CARS

National Car Connections is a rip off.

If you are contacted by National Car Connections to sell your car BEWARE. They will charge you $400 and say they will sell your car. I was quoted an unrealistic sale price and when it didn’t sell they charge me additional to keep my car on their lot to sell. I honestly feel that they make their money by getting a lot of people to pay them to sell their cars and this is their main source of revenue. If they actually sell a car then it’s a bonus.

Do your self a favour, save $400 and place an ad in the newspaper or on the internet.

POSTED BY: PATRICK SMITH - SYDNEY, NSW, AUS, 28/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK

MITSUBISHI COLT CABRIOLET 2007:  HAS BEEN OFF THE ROAD FOR 5 WEEKS AS ROOF WILL NOT OPERATE    *FEEDBACK WANTED*

28/03/2008

ISSUE:
ELECTRICAL

I purchased a brand new Mitsubishi Colt Cabriolet 1st February 2008. I returned the car 2 weeks later as the air conditioning ceased working - ran out of gas and needed re gassing.

I took car back a week later for 1st service. Next day when opening the roof it became stuck and would not open or close. I took back to dealer on 25th February and they have sent for parts, replaced bent arms and finally replaced the computer board ($3,500 cost).

The car is still not operating and Mitsubishi have not become involved and are passing the buck to the dealer. I am paying monthly repayments of $900 a month on a car I am not driving. I am driving a loan car from the dealer. I want a new replacement car but Mitsubishi are not becoming involved at all.

Has anyone else who has purchased a colt cabriolet had the same problem?

POSTED BY: LINDA OGLESBY - SYDNEY, NSW, AUS, 28/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
I have a 2006 model Mitsubishi Colt, not cabriolet, with a different problem - noise, since new. 18 months later still not resolved, again Mitsubishi refusing to get involved, passing the buck to dealers.
POSTED BY: TONY - MELBOURNE, VIC - AUS 10 MAY 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Hi, I bought Mitsubishi Colt Cab. 31st Dec 2007. In April 2008 I was involved in an accident. I waited 3 months for parts... Mitsubishi came to the party to hire me a car.... they weren’t very happy but I blasted them. How can they sell cars with no parts in stock? and still I was waiting for a seatbelt part that took 5months to come. They are ridiculous... I would never buy Mitsubishi again.

They have put me through **** the above is just half the story. I can’t begin to tell you the rest...
POSTED BY: NAME NOT SUPPLIED - SYDNEY, NSW - AUS 30 SEP 2008

NISSAN NAVARA STK 2007:  CLUTCH BURNT OUT    *FEEDBACK WANTED*

28/03/2008

ISSUE:
CLUTCH

The clutch burnt-out, they replaced clutch pressure plate flywheel. Asked why flywheel they said they do it in every case. Cost $2495.

POSTED BY: GREG PHILLIPS - BRISBANE, QLD, AUS, 28/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
Hello Greg,

I purchased a Navara brand new October 2007. I have just had it towed to the dealer today as the clutch has failed; the car only has 8000k's. Not good huh
POSTED BY: KELVIN - TEWANTIN, QLD 22/4/2008

KIA CARNIVAL LS 2002:  RE: KIA CARNIVAL     *REPLY*

28/03/2008

ISSUE:
ENGINE

Complain immediately to ACCC.

It's amazing your vehicle did 160,000km! Ours was 6 yrs old and had engine failure at only 60,000km - we're still fighting KIA for a refund. KIA won't listen to you (like the thousands of us who have complained over the years), you have to contact your local member of parliament, your fair trading dept, the minister for fair trading NSW, the media, NRMA, ACCC, the Prime Minister, anyone you can think of. KIA must be prosecuted for their **** of Aust law, but that won’t happen unless we all stand up for ourselves and do something about it.

Kevin Rudd - Do Something About This Fiasco!

POSTED BY: LYN  - WODONGA, VIC, AUS, 28/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"Carnival LS 2002: My wife & I bought this car new, it has now done ~ 160,000km (wow!), we are out of warranty (obvious) and have just discovered the dreaded oil in coolant problem. We have contacted the dealer where we bought the car & they want to strip it down & assess at our cost and "may" provide some reimbursement depending on the problem.

We called Kia head office & got the run-around. They challenged us on the service history and basically implied that we hadn't changed the coolant so this then caused the block to corrode (all this over the phone . . . marvelous insight!).

This assertion is not the case as I have changed the coolant (post warranty period) and it is fine.

What I need is information on exactly what the cause of the problem is, the technical description of the nature of their [Kia's] defective design, so that when they do pull it down we won't cop the ****.

Please help."
POSTED BY: MICHAEL FLETCHER - MEDOWIE, NSW, AUS 26 MAR 2008

========== REPLY ==========
Sorry to hear your woes Michael. Don’t waste your money paying someone to pull it down. The problem is this. The block has steel sleeves and the sleeves move so the head gasket doesn’t seal. You have all the symptoms of a blown head gasket but it's the sleeves that have moved causing the problem. Again, don’t pay someone to pull it down because it is an engineering or design fault that causes this problem.
Good Luck
Mark.
POSTED BY: MARK KURAN - MELBOURNE, VIC 27/3/2008

TOYOTA PRADO DIESEL  2007:  R/H FRONT DOOR INNER TRIM PANEL & P/WINDOW SWITCH SURROUND PAINT PITTING     *COMPLAINT*

28/03/2008

ISSUE:
INTERIOR

Toyota will not cover via warranty... Why do we bother with warranty if the dealership / manufacturers will not respond to customer complaints? This is a very minor complaint which in real terms would cost Toyota less that $100 to replace, but yet they insist on making owners go thru this pointless exercise.

Come On Toyota, whatever happened to "customer service”?

POSTED BY: KEITH SANDERSON - GEELONG, VIC, AUS, 28/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK

SMART FORFOUR  2005:  MULTIPLE FAULTS WITH VEHICLE SINCE NEW    *COMPLAINT*

27/03/2008

ISSUE:
DEALER - NEW CAR

We have owned the Smart Car for almost two years now and it has been back to Mercedes Benz of Brisbane approximately every two months for major faults. The vehicle is unreliable, and has numerous faults which it seems cannot be resolved. The dealer has been very good to us in terms of loan vehicles etc, but the issues are resolved for several days only.

We have had engines replaced, clutches, computers, clutch packs, throttle body assemblies, throttle position sensors, and others. We are so disappointed with the vehicle, and have now found out the car has no resale value.

POSTED BY: COLIN ROBINSON - MURRNBA DOWNS, QLD, AUS, 27/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK

TOYOTA KLUGER GRANDE 2007:  LACK OF PROTECTION SURROUNDING FUEL TANK AND GROUND CLEARANCE    *COMPLAINT*

27/03/2008

ISSUE:
MISCELLANEOUS

I purchased my Kluger in Dec 2007 as I wanted a reliable vehicle that could do soft off road driving like going down dirt roads and foresty tracks. I am not a heavy off-road user and I was lead to believe the Kluger was capable of these simple tasks.

We went to the Wombeyan caves South of Sydney along a dirt tourist drive. I ran over some rocks, then suddenly there was a grating noise from under the centre of the car and then a thud. I pulled over to find that the fuel tank had a rupture. We were left in the middle of nowhere for 3 hours until help could arrive. It was not until I arrive at the repair shop that I noticed that the fuel tank was protected by an aluminum heat cover.

This now brings us to my other point about the boasted road clearance you read in all of the reviews. In the middle of the floor pan is a plate which stands at 185mm not 206mm. I believe that the rock I hit got caught by this plate and pushed the rock into the heat plate then into the fuel tank. If this rock had caused a spark my family and I may have not been here to complain.

I contacted my dealer when I got back home and asked if they could report this incident but was told it was my place to contact Toyota directly as there were no forms to fill out as it was not a warranty issue. I did enlist the help of the sales manager and we wrote up our complaint on the customer service form they send you about the dealership when you buy a new car. Nothing happened.

I contacted the customer service department directly about 6 weeks ago and told them my story. When I said I was concerned about the road clearance I was told the word unladen meant no fuel in the tank. Must be the best fuel economy car in the world that drives without fuel. I was very surprised as the specifications I downloaded in September the word unladen was not to be seen but now appears in the new specifications. I have contacted the operations manager who said they would get onto it but that was 2 weeks ago and still silence.

All I am trying to get from Toyota is a plate made to stop this from happening to me or anyone else. I am not wanting to claim any out of pocket costs.

Every time you ask someone from another franchise they don't want to know about it. I asked the other day and was told that the Kluger was probably not the right car I should have purchased. A little bit late now.

POSTED BY: FRANK MATHIESON - IPSWICH, QLD, AUS, 27/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
Dear Frank,

Unfortunately the rhetoric and misleading advertising that accompanies the selling of new supposedly off-road 4x4 vehicles has reached laughable status. SUV's capable of conquering the outback are in reality no better than, perhaps inferior to, an old Kingswood. Even allegedly workhorse 4WD's are now so much less capable than they once were.

Our ten year old Hilux's should have been replaced but two minutes on your back under any of the current models shows you the design brief didn't include much past car parks. Many people would be better off with an AWD Magna or Verada. The all wheel drive system is bullet proof and they actually handle. Good thing.

Best of luck with the Kluger. Regards, John.
POSTED BY: JOHN AUSTIN - NARRANDERA, NSW 9/4/2008

KIA CARNIVAL GRAND 2006:  EXCESSIVE FUEL CONSUMPTION PROBLEM - HELP!    *COMPLAINT*

27/03/2008

ISSUE:
FUEL ECONOMY

I recently purchased a second hand Sept 2006 Grand Carnival 3.8litre V6. The car does everything it is supposed to do except its fuel economy. In the City we get 21 litre/100km and when we went on a hwy drive we got 16 litre/100km. Have taken it to Kia Dealer to look at and they can't find a problem. Emailed Kia Australia with no response.

The book says 12.8 litre/100km but I was thinking realistically that should be about 14-15 litre/100km. What have other Kia Grand Carnival driver been getting in the way of fuel economy?

Has anyone had this problem and if so how can it be resolved. Has there been any recalls on the car? The car is still under new car warranty, but the dealer has told me they have to charge if they don't find a fault cause as they have nothing to claim on warranty. The dealer said monitor the fuel consumption for 10 tanks of fuel which given its current consumption rate vs. what it should do, that little exercise alone will cost me a few hundred dollars.

Looking forward to a resolution to this problem.

POSTED BY: MARK ADAMS - PERTH, WA, AUS, 27/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== REPLY ==========
We bought our Grand Carnival in February 2007 and have been less than impressed with the fuel economy ever since. Ours too averages around 21 l/100km around town. After 6 months of back and forth correspondence we finally got Kia to test it and they recorded urban consumption of around 15 l/100km but I have no idea how they managed to achieve that figure. I love the car but I would have thought a lot more carefully about buying it, had I known how thirsty it really is.
POSTED BY: PATRICK - SYDNEY, NSW 17/4/2008

ALFA_ROMEO SPIDER  2007:  RE: BRAND NEW ALFA SPIDER - ROOF DOESNT WORK     *REPLY*

27/03/2008

ISSUE:
QUALITY

No what you would expect Philip and thank you Gary Bryant of Sydney for your useless comments. Ateco has not got a very good reputation for the cars they distribute or have distributed in the past in this country and it seems that continues. For a $100,000 car, the response by Alfa and your dealer is not good enough. Between them they should have organised to give you a replacement car exactly like yours for the time the car is off the road. How hard would that have been?

Problems can be hard to diagnose and repair sometimes, parts aren't available etc. and we as consumers understand that. But give the customer another car to drive so that he doesn’t have to come in every day and he might buy your product again.

Please post a reply on this site when your problems have been sorted.

Good Luck, Mark.

POSTED BY: MARK KURAN - MELBOURNE, VIC - AUS, 27/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
========== ORIGINAL POSTING ==========
"ALFA_ROMEO SPIDER 3.2L V6 2007: BRAND NEW ALFA SPIDER - ROOF DOESN'T WORK - The short of the story is that my brand new Alfa Romeo spider has a convertible roof that doesn't work. It won't go down. The car is now just over a month old and the roof has not been working for about 17 days. I've been back to the service centre almost every day since the problem started, but they can't fix it.

Have written a complaint letter to the dealer and also Ateco (the distributors) wondering how they can expect me to put up with this from a $100,000 car. To make things worse, apparently my car was hit by another car at the service centre last Thursday which damaged the front bumper.

Letter and more info below. As of yet, still no resolution to the problem.

17 March, 2008
Mr. David Stone,
General Manager for Alfa Romeo
Ateco Automotive Pty Ltd
Cc: Alfa Romeo Brisbane

Dear Mr. Stone,

On 30 January, 2008, I purchased a new Alfa Romeo Spider 3.2 V6 (Chassis ZAR93900005003786) from Alfa Romeo Brisbane. After previously owning an old Alfa Spider, and reading so much encouraging news about the new Spider, I decided to take the considerable plunge into purchasing this top of the range Spider. It has been just over 40 days since I collected my new vehicle, and unfortunately the car has spent 6 of those days in the service centre. For 15% of the time I have owned the vehicle, I have not been able to use it.

I am writing to you because I purchased a new car that obviously has a problem that the dealership still (as of today) is unable to fix. I feel like I have purchased a lemon, a car that is clearly not up to the high standards that I have come to expect from Alfa Romeo, especially considering the purchase price. I feel annoyed, angry and to be honest, ripped off. I purchased a new car, and already it feels old and used. I spend my mornings driving to the service centre, and my afternoons catching the bus to pick-up my Spider. I purchased a convertible car, but the problem is that the roof does not work. It has been pulled apart and worked on, but still it does not work.

I am writing to you because I would like you to do something about the problem I’m experiencing. The dealership has tried to fix the problem, but as of today, they still have not. I am left to wonder how many times a new car owner should be subjected to taking his car every day to the service centre for them to try to repair? When I talk about my experience with Alfa Romeo at my place of work, my colleagues cannot believe the situation I am going through. My vehicle is something of an icon at my office, but now, I would honestly say after hearing my story, most, if not all of my colleagues would be turned off buying an Alfa Romeo. That was not my intent, but something that happened purely as a result of my situation, which I will explain below:
• 30 January, 2008 I was scheduled to collect my new Spider from the dealer. During the demonstration of the vehicle, the dealer attempted to raise the roof (It was in the down position in the show-room), but it did not work. The dealer advised that someone had pulled the manual switch for the roof and called in a couple of Alfa Romeo mechanics to fix the problem. After almost 2 hours, they were unable to fix the roof, so I could not collect the car. They had to take it to the service centre for repair and I was advised to come back the next day in the afternoon to collect my new car.

• 2 February, 2008, I noticed while driving, that the sun visor for the passenger’s side was missing so I again returned to the dealership to have one installed.

• 12 March, 2008 I attempted to lower the roof while driving home from the city and as the roof was about half-way through lowering, it stopped and I received the error message “Temporary Hood Failure”. I was able to raise the roof, and tried lowering it again, but the same problem appeared. The service book advised me to return to the Alfa Romeo dealer, which I did the following day.

• 13 March, 2008, I arrived (unscheduled) to the Alfa Romeo Brisbane Service Centre at approximately 7:30am and spoke with Jesse the Service Advisor. I explained the problem and he advised that they would take care of the car. I was told to expect a phone call when the car was fixed and ready for collection. Around 2pm I received a call to say that they were unable to fix the fault – the hood did not work, and they would need more time to work on the car. I returned to the service centre around 4pm, collected my car, and was asked to bring it back the next day.

• 14 March, 2008, I again returned to the Alfa Romeo Brisbane Service Center at around 7:30am and dropped off my car. I returned that afternoon around 3:30pm to be advised by Jesse that they were still unable to fix the problem. Apparently some error message was detected using the computer system, but the fault could not be found. I spoke to the service manager, Peter, who again explained the problem. I requested the use of a loan car so I could leave my Alfa with the dealer, but was told that I would have to wait approximately 2-3 weeks before a loan car was available. That would mean that I could not use my new Alfa Spider convertible as a convertible for that time. I find this completely unacceptable for a new car. I also enquired about the extent of the problem, and again, no exact answers could be given. No approximate time to fix the problem, no idea exactly what the problem is, and information given that on Monday they would need to pull out the interior of my car to further examine the problem. Not a very pleasant thought for the owner of a brand new car.

• 17 March, 2008, after a weekend of roof-up driving, I returned to the dealership once again at 7:30am. I received a call around 3:30pm from Peter saying they still could not fix the problem. He advised they had repaired two crushed wires, changed the computer with another and pulled off pieces from another Spider, but still to no avail. He asked if I was able to leave my car with them overnight. I replied that would be no problem should a loan car be available, but it was not, so I collected my Spider (with most of the boot interior missing and other pieces put loosely back together), to be asked to return the next day.
So, I am now entering another day of driving my new Alfa Spider to the service centre, with once again, no clue as to what the problem is and when it will be fixed. The joy of owning a new Alfa has long gone. The feeling I get from Alfa Romeo Brisbane is that I should just accept this, get over it, and keep bringing the car back every day until the problem is fixed. I’ve spent a lot of hard earned money to buy this car and it does not work as intended to. I have a convertible that is a coupe. A brand new car, that as of tomorrow, I have been unable to use for one week.

I sincerely hope that you will consider my situation and make suggestion as to a positive resolution. I hope that as a consumer and a customer of Alfa Romeo, you will understand my reasoning for this letter. I sincerely hope to not have to take this matter any further as it has already caused enough stress and inconvenience. Purchasing a new car, particularly an Alfa Romeo, should be a pleasant and enjoyable experience. What I have gone through so far with this car and it’s hood that does not work, could not be further from that.

Yours Sincerely,

Update:

• 18 March, 2008, returned to Alfa Romeo service centre at Brisbane to collect the car around 4:45pm. Was advised by Peter that they still were no closer to finding the problem. He advised that due to a busy work load at the service centre on Wednesday, it would be best if I returned the car again on Thursday. I asked to speak to a senior manager and he suggested that would do no good. I also asked if the fax I sent the day before had been received. He checked and advised “no”. I again asked to speak to a senior manager, and he called David to come down and speak to me.

• I spoke to David and explained my whole problem. He advised that it was unacceptable to have a new car in this condition and accepted acknowledged the level of my frustration. He also understood that I needed a solid answer about how my problem was going to be resolved. He took down some details and said that he would need to speak to the head mechanic (Mario) on Wednesday, and also liaise with Ateco to see how to resolve the problem. He advised that he would call back sometime Wednesday afternoon.

• 19 March, 2008, I received a phone call at 12:16pm (Brisbane time) from Alfa Romeo customer service to acknowledge that they received my fax from the previous day. I was told that they needed to talk to the dealer regarding the situation and they would get back to me at a later time.

• 19 March, 2008, 4:00pm received a call from David. He advised that after consultation with Ateco, they were going to try 3 more things which were quite significant, to try to fix the problem. He asked if I could bring in the car the next day and I advised I would. Still no guarantee that it would fix the problem but he said he was hopeful. If they could not fix if after trying these 3 further options, he would have to go back to Ateco for resolution of the problem.

• 20 March, 2008. I returned the car to Alfa Romeo Brisbane at 7:30am. Returned later that day a 4:45pm to be informed by Peter that the problem was still not fixed, but they now think the problem was related to some sort of pump. They have ordered a replacement part which should arrive Tuesday or Wednesday to be installed. While waiting in the service centre, I was informed by one of the Alfa staff (Irene) that another car had hit my car and damaged part of the front bumper. There were some scratches to the front left hand side of the bumper bar which Peter advised he would have fixed by his spray paint guy the same time the car was in getting repaired for the hood. Also I pointed out some scratches to the roll bar behind the driver’s side which he also agreed would be replaced.

• 22 March, 2008, while driving I noticed that it appears the dash board has been removed to perform part of the work. Two pieces of the speaker on the top of the dash are broken. I will report this to Peter when the car returns on Wednesday. Also I’ve noticed that they have damaged the roof button while trying to remove it with a screwdriver. Something else to report to them.

• 25 March, 2008. Called Alfa service centre to check on the status of the part. Was advised it’s not in as yet and they will call should the part be in tomorrow."
POSTED BY: PHILLIP BRANDER - BRISBANE, QLD, AUS 26 MAR 2008

========== REPLY ==========
So what do you think anyone on this site can do for you? Grow up and wait for Alfa to fix it. You should have been prepared for this having owned an Alpha before.
POSTED BY: GARY BRYANT - SYDNEY, NSW 26/3/2008

========== UPDATE ==========
To update the situation. I returned to the dealer yesterday for them to install the new pump that had arrived from Ateco. When they took out the old pump and compared it to the new one, apparently they were different - even though the part numbers were the same. Apparently Ateco doesn't know what the problem is and they need to investigate this more. In addition, while collecting my car, I noticed that they damaged the roof and there is now a hole in the roof. The service manager has said they will have to get me a new roof. Think they just need to get me a new car.
POSTED BY: PHILLIP BRANDER - BRISBANE, QLD 28/3/2008

KIA SPECTRA  2000:  OIL LEAK    *COMPLAINT*

27/03/2008

ISSUE:
ENGINE

I own a 2000 Kia Spectra and have had nothing but problems.

I have no driver side air bag, ground effects falling off, emissions control problem, hatch back will not open good, heater vents on dash are separating from dash, and the most important thing is an oil leak in the valve cover gasket which has been replaced 3 times and still continues to coat spark plugs with oil and cause sever misfiring.

I advise anyone not to buy a Kia of any kind.

POSTED BY: KELLI COCHRAN - RINGGOLD, USA, 27/03/2008  PROVIDE FEEDBACK
NEXT PAGE
PREVIOUS  TOP    
LATEST POSTING
MAKES    LINKS
ADD YOUR CONTRIBUTION
© 2000-2008 COMPLAINTS CORNER - Bestcade MotorSM.com. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ® Registered Trademark of MotorSM